p1af72v8ma448uf11gbv1fet56t6.jpg
Smart home devices offer an opportunity for insurers to get more data and have a deeper connection with their insureds, but the nascent technology still presents challenges. That’s the finding of Aite Group’s The Smart Home: Opportunities for Insurers report, written by Gwenn Bezard. Aite lists more than a dozen challenges under several headers; we’ve identified some of the most relevant to insurance CIOs.
p1af72v8mbe1c1jtsk9k1ff05sd7.jpg

Technology Risk

When insurers select a smart device partner, they tie their reputation to that company’s customer experience. “Consumers may not be too happy with as technology ages or proves buggier than expected, or as unfortunate security and privacy mishaps make the news,” Aite writes. “It’s great to be associated with technology when it shines, but not so great when it falters.”
p1af72v8mb16njcdn18tn11ob1s3h8.jpg

Interoperability

There are still battles between standards sets, like Wi-Fi vs. Bluetooth for device communications, or Apple’s HomeKit vs. Google’s Brillio for device framework. Further, what exists is “far from mature,” Aite says, and device manufacturers don’t always stick to the standards when they say they do. “Multiple standards must be embraced across the IoT stack,” Aite says. “Some vendors are not interested in trying to integrate with other device manufactures and are sticking to developing a stand-alone product or their own ecosystem.”
p1af72v8mbc6en148la10e8h0j9.jpg

Data sharing limits

Insurers can’t just force vendors to share their data, Aite warns: “Vendors are increasingly selective in what they share, making it difficult for insurers to build services on top of whatever data device-makers are willing to share. Device manufacturers, retailers, cable companies, telcos, and home-security firms have limited appetite to unsettle their customers with one more consent form, just to please insurers.”
p1af72v8mbqvg2mm14fjgpks74a.jpg

Agent buy-in

Getting agents to push smart devices is likely to go as well as getting them to push usage-based insurance, Bezard says -- which is to say, difficult. “Insurers have been forced to go direct to promote telematics insurance,” Aite writes. “It’s unclear whether insurers could fare better with their agents in the home insurance market.”
p1af72v8mb1mp71lon1v94adh9osb.jpg

Aftermarket issues

Getting value from smart devices involved a long chain of cooperative partners to insurers – and not everyone has the best track record. “Device manufacturers have limited aftermarket support expertise. Cable and telco companies have spotty customer service track records. Home-security firms have their fair share of irate customers. Large tech firms like Apple may have their Genius Bar but are not particularly known for coming to your home to fix things,” Aite writes. “For insurers, there are simply not many obvious partners with a stellar customer service track record they can lean against.”