Life, annuity and pension firms are struggling to generate profits for shareholders, members and policyholders due to the global economic slowdown, increased competition and low interest rates. This confluence of factors is leading many insurers to reassess which products and markets are to be considered strategic, and how to best manage the discontinued, unprofitable and non-strategic portions of their business, according “Strategies and Options for Managing Closed Blocks: Life, Annuities, and Pensions Edition,” a new report from Celent.
Celent estimates that in terms of premiums, 40.4 percent of the total U.S. life insurance market (excluding critical illness and disability), and 39.6 percent of the UK life insurance market, (in terms of premiums for life, annuities and pensions) are derived from non-strategic or closed blocks.
“Ninety-two percent of insurers we spoke to highlighted that a change in strategic focus was one of the top three reasons for closing a block,” said Karen Monks, analyst with Celent’s North American Insurance Group and coauthor of the report. “Most insurers claim to have an active strategy in place to manage these blocks. However, the most popular strategy continues to be managing the run-off internally using current systems. The cost of continuing “as is” with this strategy may be too high for many as they look to reduce future liabilities and costs in line with reducing block size.”
Celent believes that many insurers will begin selling or transforming the business that supports closed blocks, but that there are a growing number of proven technologies available to manage closed blocks.
“With a growing market of mature and proven capabilities consisting of options to both variabilize costs and contain liabilities, insurers can no longer say that there is an absence of viable alternative strategies,” said Jamie Macgregor, senior analyst with Celent’s EMEA Insurance Group and coauthor of the report. “However, insurers still need to exercise care supported by effective due diligence, because the cost of getting the strategy wrong is high, with a far-reaching impact on the shareholder, policyholder, and regulator.”
The report examines why insurers opt to close books and the challenges they face when doing so. It also examines exit strategies insurers may take as they turn these policies into “run-off” businesses and the different options available to insurers in U.S. and UK markets.
Highlights from the report:
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Digital Insurance content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access