Core systems

While in flight to Boston on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 and hearing news of the horrific attacks in progress, Hemant Shah's first concern was the fate of the business associates he met with the previous day at the World Trade Center.But as the founder of Newark, Calif.-based Risk Management Solutions (RMS), he must have realized the seismic change the field he helped pioneer-catastrophe modeling-would soon experience.

As the property/casualty industry continues to get hammered by financial losses stemming from rising claims costs and deteriorating margins, Allstate Corp. is realizing that the best growth opportunity lies in the financial services arm, whose main products are life insurance and investment products."The financial industry is growing faster as an industry, so there's more of an opportunity to grow that slice of the business," says Edward M. Liddy, chairman and chief executive officer of the Northbrook, Ill.-based company.

Over the years, financial services providers have emphasized that one key to prosperity is conducting business both faster and cheaper.But in their zeal to implement a strategy based on speed and cost-containment, many financial services providers-including insurers-watched it backfire. Rather than generating positive results, they created a series of nonintegrated applications that support separate business lines and products-a silo mentality.

Until last month, the strongest positions regarding modernization of insurance regulation have been proposals for an optional federal charter for insurance companies. But another compelling-and opposing-perspective entered the debate in August, when the Alliance of American Insurers published a report that firmly argues against federal regulation for property/casualty insurance."Optional federal chartering entails a significant risk of adverse and unexpected consequences, no matter how carefully and narrowly initial legislation is crafted," the report concludes. "The better and more prudent policy is to reject federal chartering and encourage and support further modernization of state regulation."

A major step in streamlining agent licensing across the states was taken in August when the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) made the preliminary determination that at least 35 states had met the reciprocity requirements for nonresident producer licensing under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).At press time, the Kansas City, Mo.-based NAIC was expected to officially certify those states at its meeting in September in New Orleans.

Depending on the specific application, electronic networking hubs have experienced a checkered history within the insurance industry. Hubs devoted to the claims side of insurance, for example, have met with a great deal of success in that they've enabled affiliates in the claims value chain to communicate quickly and effectively in settling claims.In launching what is touted as the first electronic networking hub to serve the life reinsurance segment, Washington, D.C.-based American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) is hoping to "revolutionize the reinsurance business process," the association states.

Realizing that generating new insurance volume doesn't necessarily ensure profitability-and may even suppress it-State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. began implementing a strategy to suspend writing new homeowners policies in 17 states.The Bloomington, Ill.-based insurer is also setting the wheels in motion to fully exit the New Jersey auto insurance market over the next five years. State Farm's geographic retrenchment comes on the heels of a reported $5 billion net loss incurred since 2001. The losses were marked by rapidly increasing claims costs due to an inordinately high series of natural disasters-from hailstorms to flooding.

Despite many advances in agency automation over the last few years, insurance agents are frustrated with many aspects of the technology designed to make their lives easier. This is a conclusion of a survey conducted early this year by the ACORD User Groups Information Exchange (AUGIE).Nearly 9,000 agents and customer service representatives participated in the survey. And, according to the results, not only are agencies burdened by keeping their agency management systems updated, agents also are irritated by the chore of duplicate data entry and the costs and training issues associated dealing with carriers' proprietary systems.

Despite the slow economy and overall reductions in IT spending since 2000, U.S. insurance companies are continuing to increase their technology spending. That's according to a June report from Celent Communications, a Boston-based research and consulting firm.Budgets for 2002 are an average of 7% higher this year than last year-totaling $18 billion industrywide, according to the report, titled "IT Spending in U.S. Insurance."

Over the years, insurers have faced criticism for their lack of data integration and customer relationship management (CRM) capabilities. This deficiency took on an added dimension with the passage last October of the USA PATRIOT Act.The USA PATRIOT Act-an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism-is an anti-money-laundering law designed to prevent terrorists from setting up operations in the United States.

Even though claims service provided by property/casualty insurance carriers represents a major factor in their ability to retain customers and attract new ones, insurers are not providing the level of service that is considered acceptable to corporate customers and consumers, two new studies conclude.Moreover, even well-capitalized carriers that possess the financial stability to support quality claims service appear to be dropping the ball.

While the downturn in the economy has slowed strategic IT spending across financial services, insurance companies that have committed to new customer relationship management (CRM) strategies have not slammed on the brakes. But they are proceeding with caution, according to Meridien Research Inc., Newton, Mass.In a report titled "Insurance Client-Centric Strategies: Reach for the Stars with Service," Meridien highlights insurers that have launched ambitious CRM projects, including an Australian P&C direct underwriter.

In an unusual move, Allstate Insurance Co. took the offense by filing counterclaims against agents who filed a lawsuit against the carrier last August. The agents sued the Northbrook, Ill.-based carrier for age discrimination and violation of federal civil rights laws they claim occurred when Allstate terminated them in June 2000 (see September 2001, page 8).Allstate filed its counterclaims against the agents in March in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia-charging the agents with unjust enrichment, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing. Allstate is requesting compensatory, punitive and other damages in an amount to be determined by a jury.

After spending the past several years sitting on the sidelines, mid-size insurance companies are poised to break out of their IT spending inertia.In a report titled "Technology Market Snapshot: Mid-Size Insurance Companies," Boston-based Celent Communications Inc. estimates that mid-size insurers-those with direct written premiums between $100 million and $1 billion-will spend $1.1 billion on new technology projects over the next three to five years, primarily on Web-enabled policy administration systems and agent extranets.

Proponents of federal insurance regulation have moved one step further toward their goal. Two bills have been introduced in Congress that would establish a new federal agency to charter insurance companies choosing to bypass the cumbersome state-by-state system.In December, U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) proposed the National Insurance Chartering and Supervision Act. Then, in February, U.S. Representative John LaFalce (D-N.Y.) introduced the Insurance Industry Modernization and Consumer Protection Act. Both bills respond to lobbying from banking and insurance groups that want a simplified regulatory structure for licensing insurance companies.

Carriers and agents have invested a significant amount of capital toward electronic interface initiatives that enable the two parties to improve their data-exchange efficiencies and overall operational competencies.But as they carry this out, consumers have been neglected, to the extent that many "lack faith in the quality of online customer service," says Madelyn Flannagan, vice president of education and research for Alexandria, Va.-based Independent Insurance Agents of America (IIAA).

The outsourcing of information technology is proving to be popular with carriers these days, reversing the industry's historical apprehension of working with third parties. But experts caution that time will tell how widespread the concept becomes.In January, PacifiCare Health Systems Inc. became the latest insurer to chart this course by completing a 10-year, $1.2 billion venture with Armonk, N.Y.-based IBM Corp. and Boston-based Keane Inc.

Insurers have invested significant amounts of capital on technology based on the belief that those investments will improve their top- and bottom-line performance. However, new research indicates that carriers are experiencing mixed results to date and they're seeking refined metrics to measure how technology is impacting their operations.Those are some of the conclusions of a recent survey of 248 North American financial services firms conducted by Tillinghast-Towers Perrin. The survey is the second in a series of industry studies conducted by the management and actuarial consulting firm intended to learn how new technologies are impacting carriers' performance, and how carriers are measuring the success of IT implementations.

When Allstate Insurance Co. announced its aggressive new business approach in November 1999, analysts praised the company for its bold leadership in the New Economy.

Biometric technology is in the throes of an identity crisis. Biometrics relies on matching algorithms that analyze the physical or behavioral traits that differentiate one individual from another, such as fingerprints, the retina or iris of the eye, or the patterns of an individual's voice.Through its use, financial institutions could reduce costs related to identity theft, while simultaneously assuring consumers that their financial assets are protected.