Core systems

While the plenary body of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) gave its final approval to the proposed interstate compact at its Winter meeting in San Diego, opposition and questions raised in the debate bode for the process taking years rather than months.The proposal now goes before numerous organizations representing state lawmakers and policymakers before a final package to create a single national filing system for life products will be presented to state legislatures.

Last February, PwC Consulting unveiled an intriguing concept known as the Virtual Insurance Community (VIC), an end-to-end component-based e-business solution designed for property and casualty insurance carriers.One major distinction that set VIC apart was its vast array of services, including Web portal development, application hosting and front- and back-office components.

As banking companies from coast to coast buy agencies to get into the property/casualty insurance business, Fifth Third Bancorp, for one, is getting out.In late December, the Cincinnati-based regional banking company announced it agreed to sell its property/casualty insurance operation to Hub International Ltd., an insurance agency based in Chicago, for an undisclosed amount of cash.

This year, the U.S. insurance industry will spend an estimated $6.3 billion on new information technology projects. Of that amount, the industry could save $250 million or 23% of the $1.45 billion portion it spends on staff and consultants to integrate internal and external information technology systems.The magic bullet to these dramatic savings is ACORD XML, according to a report by Boston-based Celent Communications Inc. Carriers surveyed by Celent either expected to or had actually achieved integration efficiencies of 20% to 30% when using ACORD XML standards. A few reported efficiencies on some projects of as much as 80%.

Annuities have been a mainstay product in banks since the 1980s, and over time, many providers have tried to push into the crowded channel. Has it gotten too crowded?Given the litany of failed bank-channel programs-Sage Life and Massachusetts Mutual Life come to mind-that litter the annuity battlefield, the answer looks like yes.

Faced with a whole new ball game of unprecedented federal backup for catastrophic losses caused by a terrorist attack, the U.S. insurance industry, including underwriters, reinsurers and brokers, are scrambling to interpret the new legislation and revise their underwriting programs to deal with the issues presented by the new law.The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 will take effect upon date of enactment and provides for a sliding scale of government backup over its three-year life. While there seems little disagreement that the backstop will increase availability of terror risk coverage, its effect on pricing remains to be seen.

The life insurance industry recognizes the Internet will be a valuable tool to help it compete in the future. But there is still a long road to travel before life carriers can become true e-businesses.That's the conclusion of a recent study conducted by the American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, D.C. The study, "Life Insurance and Electronic Commerce: Present and Future," examines several key issues related to the Internet, such as electronic signatures and cyber security. The focus was primarily on insurer-to-consumer initiatives.

Although the use of credit scores as an underwriting tool for auto and homeowners insurance is now an established practice, consumer groups, legislators and regulators still have not had their final say on the matter.Indeed, state lawmakers across the nation can look forward in 2003 to consideration of numerous measures to curb the practice-and in some cases outright ban it.

Insurance industry lobbyists acknowledge that the financial services industry could come under some expensive and restrictive privacy compliance rules next year if Congress follows through on plans to hold extensive hearings on the issue.Indeed, Congress could decide to write new laws mandating that consumers be allowed to "opt-in" to sharing of financial data given to one unit of a financial services company with another unit. Currently, the policy at both the state and federal level is that consumers have the right to "opt-out" of companies' cross-marketing programs.

In many ways, insurance companies have become embroiled in a sticky Catch-22 regarding their ability to use, manage and deploy information technology internally.The catch: Carriers have a good shot at becoming proficient at internally managing IT if they devote only the necessary resources and apply the proper approach to making it happen. But they won't commit to either of these until they are certain that success is in the offing.

While in flight to Boston on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001 and hearing news of the horrific attacks in progress, Hemant Shah's first concern was the fate of the business associates he met with the previous day at the World Trade Center.But as the founder of Newark, Calif.-based Risk Management Solutions (RMS), he must have realized the seismic change the field he helped pioneer-catastrophe modeling-would soon experience.

As the property/casualty industry continues to get hammered by financial losses stemming from rising claims costs and deteriorating margins, Allstate Corp. is realizing that the best growth opportunity lies in the financial services arm, whose main products are life insurance and investment products."The financial industry is growing faster as an industry, so there's more of an opportunity to grow that slice of the business," says Edward M. Liddy, chairman and chief executive officer of the Northbrook, Ill.-based company.

Over the years, financial services providers have emphasized that one key to prosperity is conducting business both faster and cheaper.But in their zeal to implement a strategy based on speed and cost-containment, many financial services providers-including insurers-watched it backfire. Rather than generating positive results, they created a series of nonintegrated applications that support separate business lines and products-a silo mentality.

Until last month, the strongest positions regarding modernization of insurance regulation have been proposals for an optional federal charter for insurance companies. But another compelling-and opposing-perspective entered the debate in August, when the Alliance of American Insurers published a report that firmly argues against federal regulation for property/casualty insurance."Optional federal chartering entails a significant risk of adverse and unexpected consequences, no matter how carefully and narrowly initial legislation is crafted," the report concludes. "The better and more prudent policy is to reject federal chartering and encourage and support further modernization of state regulation."

A major step in streamlining agent licensing across the states was taken in August when the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) made the preliminary determination that at least 35 states had met the reciprocity requirements for nonresident producer licensing under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).At press time, the Kansas City, Mo.-based NAIC was expected to officially certify those states at its meeting in September in New Orleans.

Depending on the specific application, electronic networking hubs have experienced a checkered history within the insurance industry. Hubs devoted to the claims side of insurance, for example, have met with a great deal of success in that they've enabled affiliates in the claims value chain to communicate quickly and effectively in settling claims.In launching what is touted as the first electronic networking hub to serve the life reinsurance segment, Washington, D.C.-based American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) is hoping to "revolutionize the reinsurance business process," the association states.

Realizing that generating new insurance volume doesn't necessarily ensure profitability-and may even suppress it-State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. began implementing a strategy to suspend writing new homeowners policies in 17 states.The Bloomington, Ill.-based insurer is also setting the wheels in motion to fully exit the New Jersey auto insurance market over the next five years. State Farm's geographic retrenchment comes on the heels of a reported $5 billion net loss incurred since 2001. The losses were marked by rapidly increasing claims costs due to an inordinately high series of natural disasters-from hailstorms to flooding.

Despite many advances in agency automation over the last few years, insurance agents are frustrated with many aspects of the technology designed to make their lives easier. This is a conclusion of a survey conducted early this year by the ACORD User Groups Information Exchange (AUGIE).Nearly 9,000 agents and customer service representatives participated in the survey. And, according to the results, not only are agencies burdened by keeping their agency management systems updated, agents also are irritated by the chore of duplicate data entry and the costs and training issues associated dealing with carriers' proprietary systems.

Despite the slow economy and overall reductions in IT spending since 2000, U.S. insurance companies are continuing to increase their technology spending. That's according to a June report from Celent Communications, a Boston-based research and consulting firm.Budgets for 2002 are an average of 7% higher this year than last year-totaling $18 billion industrywide, according to the report, titled "IT Spending in U.S. Insurance."

Over the years, insurers have faced criticism for their lack of data integration and customer relationship management (CRM) capabilities. This deficiency took on an added dimension with the passage last October of the USA PATRIOT Act.The USA PATRIOT Act-an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism-is an anti-money-laundering law designed to prevent terrorists from setting up operations in the United States.