Privacy advocates will have to pin their hopes on Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., if they want to see national privacy standards enhanced through legislation extending provisions of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) that expire at the end of this year.The House in September passed its version of FCRA legislation, via the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, using the measure more as a vehicle to provide citizens with increased protection from, and remediation for, identity theft.

Advocates of the use of credit scores in personal lines underwriting and rating could be excused if they are feeling a bit under siege lately.The industry has been generally pleased with the actions of state legislatures that have supported carriers' use of consumers' credit information for approving policies and setting policy rates.

Insurers long ago developed tools to perform risk modeling for natural disasters such as floods, hurricanes and tornadoes. But Aon Corp. has launched a different kind of venture to help its clients reduce workplace violence.Realizing the great amount of pressure on its corporate clients to understand the dynamics that contribute to workplace aggression, Aon in July aligned itself with the Center for Aggression Management (CAM), a Winter Park, Fla.-based organization dedicated to identifying, measuring and preventing risks related to workplace aggression and violence.

Although the federal government granted the healthcare industry an extra year to comply with the transactions and code set rules mandated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), experts say a procedural mess is set to occur on Oct. 16.That's the date for the HIPAA deadline-which originally was set for Oct. 16, 2002-for health plans, providers and clearinghouses to cease processing proprietary transactions and use only standardized transactions that comply with the 1996 law.

Although the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is focused primarily on financial reporting and accounting processes, the law is forcing publicly traded companies to assess their IT systems too.Thanks to the transgressions at Enron, WorldCom and other now notorious corporations, all publicly traded companies in the United States-including insurers-are in the throes of trying to determine how to comply with the law that was passed to deter such corporate malfeasance in the future.

Humana needed to replace its outdated billing system that relied mostly on paper and snail mail. Today Humana offers its employer-group customers an easy-to-use e-billing alternative that's available in real-time on the Internet.Back in 1999, Humana Inc. began to implement a wide-ranging e-business strategy that would include customer self-service features across its spectrum of business lines.

Life insurers are seeking quick and painless solutions for compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, which requires insurers to develop and implement anti-money laundering (AML) compliance programs intended to disrupt financial networks that support terrorist groups.How they plan to achieve it is the next hurdle: will life insurers decide that it's more prudent to develop a compliance program in-house or seek third-party support? A survey released in February by Gartner Inc., Stamford, Conn., focused on how enterprises choose their anti-money laundering software, whether they were pleased with their choices and whether they were able to remain within their budgets.

The insurance industry could learn as early as this week the broad outlines and ballpark costs of the so-called third wave of asbestos litigation.That's the timeline Sen. Orin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has established for drafting proposed asbestos litigation legislation as he has woven his way between industry, insurer and labor interests in an effort to forge consensus legislation that will pass the Congress.

Facing a mandate to reduce their loss exposures for a variety of reasons-from the threat of terrorism to the need to secure better insurance coverage terms-risk managers are upping the ante on loss control spending.A survey of nearly 400 risk managers conducted by Warren, N.J.-based Chubb Group of Insurance Cos. revealed that nearly 50% of respondents increased their loss control spending over the past year; 34% held their budgets constant; and 5% decreased their loss control spending.

As concerns over asbestos liability continue to mount, industry observers say carriers need to find solutions to manage the risk-other than just throwing money at it.Insurance Services Office Inc. (ISO) estimates that newly incurred asbestos loss and loss-adjustment expenses rose from $1.4 billion in 2000 to $3.7 billion in 2001. Based on partial data, Jersey City, N.J.-based ISO estimates newly incurred asbestos losses more than doubled in 2002, rising to about $8 billion.

With technology playing an increasingly important role in the modernization and standardization of the 50-state system of insurance regulation, officials from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners have decided the time is ripe for development of standards that can make the process more seamless.The National Technical Architecture working group started work early this year on standards that will be mandatory for information projects developed directly for the Kansas City, Mo.-based NAIC, and serve as a guide for state and industry efforts that target national regulatory interoperability.

A year ago, health insurers, health plans, providers, hospitals and clearinghouses collectively were heaving a sigh of relief.That's because they were granted the option of applying for a one-year extension to comply with the standardized transactions and code set rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Allstate Insurance Co. is in the process of negotiating a settlement with the California Department of Motor Vehicles to restore the carrier's access to electronic driving records in the state.In January, California DMV officials indefinitely suspended the Northbrook, Ill.-based carrier's access to electronic driving records.

As if a ghost from the past has reawakened, property/casualty insurers are again confronting a huge potential wave of asbestos claims.Indeed, the recent moves by Ace Ltd. to boost its asbestos reserves by $1.9 billion, following Travelers Property Casualty Corp.'s decision to add almost $2.5 billion to its asbestos reserves, has caught both credit agencies and financial analysts off guard.

The insurance industry is taking aim at a survey sponsored by the Washington Office of the Insurance Commissioner which raises the issue of whether credit scoring can adversely impact the ability of low-income and minority consumers to obtain affordable insurance.The latest controversy over the use of credit scoring comes as the industry braces for another round of legislative efforts to either curb the practice or ban it altogether. As many as 40 states are expected to tackle the issue this year, industry groups say.

What do you do when you are bound by law to educate thousands of employees in less than a year on privacy standards contained in a 350-page, fine-print document?If you're like most health insurers, you spend a lot of time interpreting the privacy rules of the Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), you boil them down to simplified policies and guidelines, you determine what employees need to know to perform specific jobs, you develop a training program, and you begin instruction.

"No more easy money for criminals, just hard time." With those words, President George Bush signed into law the most sweeping corporate reform legislation since the New Deal of the 1930s.Under the new law, the stakes for white-collar crime have increased dramatically, with the CEOs and CFOs of America's corporations now required to attest under oath to the accuracy of their financial statements under the threat of million-dollar fines and prison sentences.

To most insurance companies, knowing the identities of their customers has always been motivated by commission-that is, the more insurers know about them increases the rate at which they can market additional services.Following the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act in late 2001, carriers are gleaning details about their customer base motivated by omission-that is, how to eliminate unsavory customers whose sole objective is setting up insurance accounts to break the law.

While the plenary body of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) gave its final approval to the proposed interstate compact at its Winter meeting in San Diego, opposition and questions raised in the debate bode for the process taking years rather than months.The proposal now goes before numerous organizations representing state lawmakers and policymakers before a final package to create a single national filing system for life products will be presented to state legislatures.

Faced with a whole new ball game of unprecedented federal backup for catastrophic losses caused by a terrorist attack, the U.S. insurance industry, including underwriters, reinsurers and brokers, are scrambling to interpret the new legislation and revise their underwriting programs to deal with the issues presented by the new law.The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 will take effect upon date of enactment and provides for a sliding scale of government backup over its three-year life. While there seems little disagreement that the backstop will increase availability of terror risk coverage, its effect on pricing remains to be seen.