Subject Root Tag

A major step in streamlining agent licensing across the states was taken in August when the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) made the preliminary determination that at least 35 states had met the reciprocity requirements for nonresident producer licensing under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).At press time, the Kansas City, Mo.-based NAIC was expected to officially certify those states at its meeting in September in New Orleans.

Depending on the specific application, electronic networking hubs have experienced a checkered history within the insurance industry. Hubs devoted to the claims side of insurance, for example, have met with a great deal of success in that they've enabled affiliates in the claims value chain to communicate quickly and effectively in settling claims.In launching what is touted as the first electronic networking hub to serve the life reinsurance segment, Washington, D.C.-based American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) is hoping to "revolutionize the reinsurance business process," the association states.

At a hearing in June before a subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives, Joseph J. Gasper, president and COO of Nationwide Financial Services Inc., gave a telling example of the regulatory hurdles insurers face when trying to launch new products.It went like this: Nationwide had developed a new annuity last year for contract owners interested in market timing. The Columbus, Ohio-based insurer filed countrywide for product approval, but seven months later, approval was still pending in five states-four of which were major markets for the new product.

Ever since Gramm-Leach-Bliley passed in November 1999, momentum has been building to reform the state-based insurance regulatory system. The landmark legislation, which allows banks, insurers and brokerages to merge and compete with one another, also ordered the states to enact uniform producer licensing laws by November 2002 (see "Here Come The Feds, May 2001).Yet, although the law mandates uniform producer licensing, it essentially left the rest of insurance regulation to the states. And, according to many in the industry, the state-based system puts insurers at a disadvantage-especially when they're trying to compete nationally with banks and brokerages.

Most insurers and reinsurers espouse a belief that new business doesn't always equal good business. To most insurance providers, the honeymoon period with a new customer ends as soon as claims activity intensifies.

For years, paper-based processing for a commercial insurance policy has made it exceedingly difficult to assess risk and issue accurately priced coverage. Moreover, many insurers and reinsurers have had a hard time fully analyzing client data due to the lack of disclosure by the client.But Schaumburg, Ill.-based Zurich North America launched in February a Web-based solution-called the Business Interruption Coverage calculator-which will be an integral part of its underwriting procedure for business interruption coverage.

As two bastions of tradition, neither the legal profession nor insurance carriers eagerly jumped onto the Internet bandwagon in the late 1990s.But now, the dust of the dot-com wreck is settling, and carriers and their counsel are beginning to see where it makes sense for them to use online technology to manage legal costs and improve collaboration.

Technology budgets traditionally have been an easy target for firms looking to lob off expenses and improve their bottom lines. And, while carriers-especially property/casualty insurers-are experiencing tough financial times, they are not slashing their IT budgets, according to the findings of an exclusive Insurance Networking survey of 82 carriers, agents, brokers and services firms.Nevertheless, carriers and agencies are taking distinctly different paths this year, with carriers ratcheting up spending on internal development, while agencies are cutting back on custom software and increasing packaged installations.

Realizing that generating new insurance volume doesn't necessarily ensure profitability-and may even suppress it-State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. began implementing a strategy to suspend writing new homeowners policies in 17 states.The Bloomington, Ill.-based insurer is also setting the wheels in motion to fully exit the New Jersey auto insurance market over the next five years. State Farm's geographic retrenchment comes on the heels of a reported $5 billion net loss incurred since 2001. The losses were marked by rapidly increasing claims costs due to an inordinately high series of natural disasters-from hailstorms to flooding.

Despite many advances in agency automation over the last few years, insurance agents are frustrated with many aspects of the technology designed to make their lives easier. This is a conclusion of a survey conducted early this year by the ACORD User Groups Information Exchange (AUGIE).Nearly 9,000 agents and customer service representatives participated in the survey. And, according to the results, not only are agencies burdened by keeping their agency management systems updated, agents also are irritated by the chore of duplicate data entry and the costs and training issues associated dealing with carriers' proprietary systems.

Individuals who have experienced an auto accident or incurred damage to their vehicle often discover that the road to swift claims settlement is a bumpy, winding and volatile one.

Claims processing capabilities within the automobile insurance segment is not unlike a car itself-hitting on all cylinders is essential to ensure high performance.In 1999, Mayfield Village, Ohio-based Progressive Insurance Co. debuted TotalPro, a Web-based claims processing application that can be activated by both internal affiliates and Progressive policyholders.

Over the last 18 months, State Auto Insurance Co. has been using an intranet application that provides its independent agents with Web-based access to the company's mainframe for policy rates and applications.

The Internet standards-based approach to software distribution-called Web Services-promises to greatly simplify IT integration of legacy applications. Described as a "Leggo" approach for assembling different "services" from back-office systems-such as rating a policy and submitting a claim-Web services are based on open standards, including XML (extensible markup language), SOAP (simple object access protocol), WSDL (Web services description language) and UDDI (universal description, discovery and integration). As a result, customized integration is greatly reduced.But a battle is brewing between Web services platform vendors vying for market share-in particular, between IBM Corp.'s WebSphere-which is based on the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) platform-and Microsoft Corp.'s .NET. The classic capitalistic struggle between these two camps may make Web services more complicated than promised.

Most insurance agents will admit that flood insurance isn't an easy sell. Property owners, both individual and commercial, are often aware that their policy covers fire damage, but most don't realize that it doesn't cover flood or mudslide damage.Rarely do these parties investigate the prospects of securing a flood insurance policy, which can cause disastrous ramifications because most floods don't qualify for federal disaster aid. Only floods declared national disasters by the president qualify for federal assistance, which comes in the form of a grant or a federal loan that must be paid back with interest.

Today's insurance marketplace is anything but "business as usual." Competition from new market entrants, deregulation, and fast-changing consumer expectations are challenging insurers' historically risk-averse corporate cultures.Traditional strategies and processes will not be successful in this market. To succeed, insurers must develop new business strategies and apply new technologies that will support business transformation.

Insurance industry executives are wrestling with the complexities of customer relationship management (CRM), trying to understand what it can mean for their organizations and how to proceed to adopt appropriate CRM solutions.

As insurers' expectations for e-commerce revenue tumbled over the past couple years, e-business spending has focused on self-service initiatives such as enterprise portals and agent extranets. But most insurers lack the infrastructure and customer understanding to maximize the return on these and other technology investments, such as customer relationship management.Therefore, insurers need to create financial services hubs: technology platforms for delivering services that span multiple systems.

With the insurance industry, one moment of impact-whether it's two vans, two workers or two ships-can initiate a lengthy reporting trail weighed down by paper handling and delays. The first notice of loss, which carriers receive from agents by phone, fax, or Internet, starts the trail.

Some senior insurance executives have a hard time understanding how a seemingly esoteric technology such as artificial intelligence (A.I.) could possibly be used by the insurance industry.This mental juxtaposition is ironic because the potential applications are manifold. And more importantly, the insurance industry was one of the first to widely adopt artificial intelligence technology in the form of expert underwriting systems.